Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sumit Nagal vs Riccardo Bonadio Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nagal vs Bonadio analysis and find out who is favored!
Sumit Nagal vs Riccardo Bonadio Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nagal 1 - 1 Bonadio
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nagal has won 55.21% of points on their second serve, while Bonadio has won 50.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nagal, in recent form, has won 53.77% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bonadio has won 50.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.25% and 32.98% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nagal has saved 63.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bonadio has saved 59.6% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nagal has won 58.82% of matches played (W/L 40/ 28), with Bonadio winning 42% (W/L 21/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 215/ 127), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Bonadio has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 373/ 279), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.44% of matches (W/L 29/ 16), where as Bonadio has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.48% of matches (W/L 20/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nagal winning 1 times and Bonadio being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Nagal winning 3 and Bonadio winning 3. The last match between Nagal and Bonadio was at the Como Challenger, 29-08-2023, First, Clay with Sumit Nagal getting the victory 6-4 0-6 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:14:49.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nagal and Bonadio have played a deciding set 2 times, with Nagal winning 1 times and Bonadio 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nagal winning 1, and Bonadio 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nagal has played against opponents with an average rank of 246.91 while Bonadio has played against players with an average rank of 313.36.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nagal has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bonadio has won 22% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nagal has converted 47.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bonadio has converted 42.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
95
Rank
80
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
347
Rank
164
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
61% (318-207)
Career Total W/L
57% (445-338)
59% (19-13)
YTD W/L
48% (10-11)
$434,190
Career Prize Money
$158,415
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sumit Nagal | Riccardo Bonadio |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
| Games Won | 24 | 30 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:14:49 | 2:14:49 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (105/171) | 56% (87/155) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (64/105) | 70% (61/87) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (33/66) | 53% (36/68) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (6/14) | 56% (10/18) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (58/155) | 43% (74/171) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 0-6 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Sumit Nagal
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
41%
(
39 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
| 6-2 2-6 6-3 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Sumit Nagal
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sumit Nagal | Riccardo Bonadio |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (19/13) | 48% (10/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (46/32) | 51% (26/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (393/343) | 50% (250/250) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (14/8) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 53% (8/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 59 | 60 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 46 | 37 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:34 | 1:41:23 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 205.56 | 278.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (1662/2372) | 61% (909/1497) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (1103/1662) | 66% (600/909) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (392/710) | 50% (296/588) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (101/214) | 42% (63/149) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (923/2332) | 40% (605/1521) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 71% (10/4) | 47% (9/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (18/29) | 48% (10/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 33% (3/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (22/17) | 73% (11/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (22/5) | 27% (11/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 20% (10/2) |
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
43%
(
30 of
70)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
73%
(
64 of
88)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
107
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Sumit Nagal
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Flavio Cobolli
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Corentin Moutet
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Riccardo Bonadio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
55%
(
53 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nikita Mashtakov
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Marcello Serafini
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Hazem Naow
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Antoine Bellier
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
44%
(
51 of
117)
2
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
12
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
45 of
117)
107
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Nagal Vs Bonadio Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Sumit Nagal
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
